Evaluation
|
Beginning |
Developing |
Qualified |
Exemplary |
Score |
Student collaboration |
Student was completely uninvolved in cooperative learning groups. |
Student was paying attention to other students as they discussed guided discussion questions, but they were not directly involved themselves. |
Student was somewhat involved in answering and discussing guided discussion questions. |
Student played a large role in answering and discussing guided discussion questions. |
|
| The quality of the text | The text is confusing and do not make it clear that you understood what you read. Details are translated in ways that do not make sense. | The text put basic material in your own words, but it is confusing to read. It is not clear if you understand most of the questions. | The text put basic material in your own words in a way that others can mostly understand. Some details might be confusing. | The text put detailed and interesting material in your own words in a way that others can easily understand. | |
| Presentation | Presentation shows low amounts of thought, creativity and design elements. |
Presentation shows some amounts of thought, creativity and design elements. | Presentation shows sufficient amounts of thought, creativity and design elements. | Presentation shows high amounts of thought, creativity and design elements. |